CREATIVITY GAME


Theory and Practice of Spatial Planning | Number 6 | Year 2018 | ISSN 2350-3637

Andreja Cirman1, Nataša Pichler Milanović2, Melita Balas Rant2:

Overview of Economic Potentials of Slovenian Urban Areas for Defining Key Urban Policies

Creative Commons License DOI 10.15292/IU-CG.2018.06.013-021 | UDK 711.4 (497.4):330.34 | SUBMITTED: 9/2018 | REVISED: 10/2018 | PUBLISHED: 11/2018
Author's affiliation: 1 University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Economics, Slovenia , 2 University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Economics, Slovenia



ABSTRACT
The urban development process has been under intensive economic restructuring, socio-demographic and environmental transformations with technological innovations. Economic activities are geographically located to improve territorial competitiveness of companies as they have important role and possibilities of the economy of scale with cost effective market advantages. In this research the economic development potentials of selected urban areas (69 municipalities) in Slovenia have been defined through key development factors that are also causing the development gap as sources of external economies between selected urban areas. The selection of individual development factors of the economic potential of urban areas is based on the most important economic indicators (28) as initially implemented in the methodology of the ESPON II POLYCE project (2010-2012) Metropolisation & Polycentric Development in Central Europe for defining the potentials of MEGA (Metropolitan European Growth Areas) in Europe. The results of our analysis of economic potential of urban areas in Slovenia has emphasized the role of the capital city of Ljubljana (and functional urban area) with the highest concentration of the above average results followed with two regional urban areas (of national importance, SPRS 2004) – Nova Gorica and Novo mesto. The profiles of individual towns and urban areas are important empirically supported instrument for policy makers and other stakeholders for enhancing territorial competitiveness and cohesion, and strategic recommendations for further key urban policies.

KEYWORDS
development economic potential, urban areas, economies of agglomeration, city competitiveness

FULL ARTICLE
https://iu-cg.org/paper/2018/IU_CG_06-2018_cirman.pdf (0.41 MB)

CITATION
Cirman, A., Pichler Milanović, N., Balas Rant, M. (2018). Overview of Economic Potentials of Slovenian Urban Areas for Defining Key Urban Policies. Igra ustvarjalnosti - Creativity Game, (6), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.15292/IU-CG.2018.06.013-021

Copy citation to clipboard (APA style)

LITERATURE AND SOURCES:
Angeriz, A., McCombie, J., and Roberts, M.. (2008). New Estimates of Returns to Scale and Spatial Spillovers for EU Regional Manufacturing, 1986–2002. International Regional Science Review 31 (1), str. 62–87.
Camagni, R. (2009): Territorial capital and regional development. In R. Capello and P. Nijkamp (eds.) Handbook of Regional Growth and Development Theories. P. 118-132, Northampton, Mass.: Edward Elgar Publ.
Duranton, G., Puga, D. (2001). Nursery Cities: Urban Diversity, Process Innovation and The Life Cycle of Products. American Economic Review, 91(5), str. 1454–1477.
Duranton, G., Puga, D. (2004). Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies, v J. Vernon Henderson and Jacques-François Thisse (ur.), Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics. Amsterdam: North Holland, str. 2063–2117.
European smart cities. http://www.smart-cities.eu/
ESPON (2005): Potentials for polycentric development in Europe. ESPON 1.1.1 Final report.http://www.espon.eu/mmp/online/website/content/projects/259/648/file_1174/fr-1.1.1_revised-full.pdf
ESPON (2010): New Evidence on Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Territories. First ESPON 2013 Synthesis Report. Luxembourg. www.espon.eu
ESPON 2013 DB (2010): Draft Final Report. www.espon.eu
ESPON ATTREG (2010): Attractiveness of European Regions and Cities for Residents and Visitors (2010-2012), Draft Interim Report. www.espon.eu
ESPON FOCI (2009) FOCI Future Orientations for Cities, http://www.espon.eu/main/ Menu_ Projects/Menu_AppliedResearch/foci.html
ESPON POLYCE (2012) Metropolisation and Policentric Development in Central Europe. http://www.espon.eu/main/ Menu_ Projects/Menu_AppliedResearch/foci.html
Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic N. and Meijers E. (2007): http://www.smart-cities.eu/
Jofre-Monseny, J., Marín-López, R. & Viladecans-Marsal, E. (2014): Determinants Of Localization And Urbanization Economies. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 54, No. 2, str. 313–337.
Jofre-Monseny, J. (2009). The Scope of Agglomeration Economies: Evidence from Catalonia, Papers in Regional Science, 88, str. 575–590.
Krugman, P. (1995). Urban Concentration: The Role of Increasing Returns and Transport Costs. Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics 1994. Washington: The World Bank.
McKinsey Global Institute (2011): Urban world: Mapping the economic power of cities. New York: McKinsey Global Institute.
O’Sullivan, A. (2003): Urban Economics. Boston, MA: Irwin McGraw-Hill.
URBAN AUDIT: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/region_cities/city_urban
Viladecans-Marsal, E. (2004). Agglomeration Economies and Industrial Location: City-Level Evidence, Journal of Economic Geography, 4, str. 565–582.
The World Bank (2008): World Development Report 2009: Reshaping Economic Geography. Washington: The World Bank Publications.