CREATIVITY GAME


Theory and Practice of Spatial Planning | Number 5 | Year 2017 | ISSN 2350-3637

Andreja Troha:

Changing Settlement Patterns in Areas of Autochtonous Dispersed Settlement

Creative Commons License DOI 10.15292/IU-CG.2017.05.076-088 | UDK 711.1(497.4) | SUBMITTED: 9/2017 | REVISED: 10/2017 | PUBLISHED: 11/2017
Author's affiliation: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Architecture, Slovenia



ABSTRACT
Dispersed settlement is understood as an autochthonous characteristic of certain areas, which in the past, along with securing livelihood of the population, contributed to the establishment and preservation of the cultural landscape, while dispersed building is understood as a negative phenomenon in space. The latter basically means the deterioration of the cultural landscape, particularly tied to suburbanisation and related social costs, which are a consequence of traffic growth and the related maintenance and building of infrastructure. In urban or urbanised areas, the occurrence of both forms of settlement is much easier to observe and identify, both using mathematical methods or applying individual indicators. However, in areas with a prevalence of the dispersed settlement pattern it is difficult to quantitively or qualitatively evaluate these definitions. Using various approaches (both substantive and mathematical) to evaluating the individual characteristics of space we wanted to draw a divided between dispersed settlement and dispersed building.

KEYWORDS
urbanisation, suburbanisation, dispersed building, dispersed settlement, dispersed urbanisation, indicators

FULL ARTICLE
https://www.iu-cg.org/paper/2017/IU_CG_05-2017_troha.pdf (5.11 MB)

CITATION
Troha, A. (2017). Changing Settlement Patterns in Areas of Autochtonous Dispersed Settlement. Igra ustvarjalnosti - Creativity Game, (5), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.15292/IU-CG.2017.05.076-088

Copy citation to clipboard (APA style)

LITERATURE AND SOURCES:
Brody, S. (2013). The Characteristics, Causes, and Consequences of Sprawling Development Patterns in the United States. Nature Education Knowledge 4(5): 2.
Calthorpe, P. in Fulton, W. (2001). The regional city. Washington, D.C., Island Press.
European Commission. Joint Research Centre (2006): Urban sprawl in Europe : the ignored Challenge. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, cop.
Fister, P. (1993). Arhitekturne krajine in regije Slovenije. Ministrstvo za okolje in prostor, Zavod RS za prostorsko planiranje, Ljubljana.
Furman Oman, M. (2012). Razpršena gradnja v luči razvoja slovenske prostorske zakonodaje. Doktorska disertacija. Univerza v Ljubljani, Ljubljana.
Gabrijelčič, P. (1997). Razpršena gradnja. Svetovni dan Habitata; Svetovni dan urbanizma: zbornik strokovnega srečanja, Ljubljana, 81‒84.
Hudoklin, J. et al. (2005). Podrobnejša pravila za urejanje prostora ohranjanje prepoznavnosti slovenskih krajin. Novo mesto. Accessed on 26 February 2016: http://www.arhiv.mop.gov.si/fileadmin/mop.gov.si/pageuploads/podrocja/prostor/pdf/crp/crp.pdf
Košir, F. (1993). Zamisel mesta. Ljubljana: Slovenska matica, 11.
Meyer-Veden, D., Eisenanack, K. (2006). Urban sprawl processes: using QuAG to sensitize stakeholders for interdependencies between actors. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 1‒4. Accessed on 30 March 2017: https://www.uni-oldenburg.de/fileadmin/user_upload/wire/fachgebiete/envdev/download/sg-2006.pdf
Mihelčič, B. et al. (2015). Urbanistični slovar. Ljubljana: Urbanistični inštitut RS in Založba ZRC SAZU, 170.
Onufrija, K., (2006). Analiza stanja v prostoru v Občini Škofja Loka. Škofja Loka: Občina Škofja Loka.
Patacchini, E., Zenou, Y., Henderson, J. V., & Epple, D. (2009). Urban Sprawl in Europe. Brookings-wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 125–149. Accessed on 26 February 2016: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.556.7517&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Peiser, R. (2001). Decomposing urban sprawl. Town planning review. Vol. 76.
Pichler-Milanović, N. (2007). European urban sprawl. Dela - Oddelek za geografijo Filozofske fakultete v Ljubljani, No. 27, 101‒133.
Ravbar, M. (2005). »Urban sprawl«: popačena slika (sub)urbanizacije v Sloveniji?. Geografski vestnik, vol. 77, No. 1 (2005), 27‒36. Accessed on 26 February 2016:
http://zgs.zrc-sazu.si/Portals/8/Geografski_vestnik/gv77-1-ravbar.pdf
Rebernik, D. (2004). Sodobni urbanizacijski procesi: Od suburbanizacije do reurbanizacije. Geografski vestnik vol. 76, No. 2 (2004), 53–63.
Rebernik, D., (2008). Urbana geografija: Geografske značilnosti mest in urbanizacije v svetu. Univerza v Ljubljani, Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete, Ljubljana, 51‒60.
Troha, A., Krajner, P. (2007). Strokovne podlage za poselitev. Železniki: Občina Železniki.
Valenčak J. et al. (2005). Izhodišča za pripravo strategije prostorskega razvoja in prostorskega reda Občine Železniki. Železniki: Občina Železniki.
Vintar Mally, K. (2006). Prednosti in omejitve uporabe kazalcev sonaravnega razvoja. Dela - Oddelek za geografijo Filozofske fakultete v Ljubljani, No. 26, 43‒59.
Wassmer, R.W. (2002). An economic perspective on urban sprawl, Sacramento. Accessed on 26 February 2016: http://www.csus.edu/indiv/w/wassmerr/sprawl.pdf