CREATIVITY GAME

Olga Ioannou:

Architectural Education Online and In-Class Synergies: Reshaping the Course and the Learner

DOI 10.15292/IU-CG.2015.03.30-37 | UDK 72.01:378 | SUBMITTED: 06/2015 | REVISED: 09/2015 | PUBLISHED: 10/2015
Author's affiliation: School of Architecture, National Technical University of Athens - NTUA, Athens, Greece

PDF

ABSTRACT
Architectural courses have been traditionally planned in the context of a physical classroom where the direct rapport of the students with the instructor is an unswerving condition for learning. This model was formed, however, at a time when learning was not impacted by technology. Although digital media have infiltrated architectural practice, they still elude architectural design education. The author argues that the integration of online educational practices in architectural curricula can benefit design education immensely by raising interaction and making students assume responsibility for their learning. To demonstrate the gains of online and in-class synergy in architectural education a blended course was set up at the postgraduate program of the National Technical University of Athens, School of Architecture. Current trends of online learning were carefully examined in regard to their compatibility with the architectural design culture of “learning by doing”. The course was eventually founded on the core principles of the connectivist model where learning consists of the ability to construct and traverse networks of connections (Downes, 2012). This approach was chosen because of its affinity to the design praxis where similarly students are required to make critical connections in order to map spatial phenomena and reconstruct the real. Course content was redesigned to comply with its new medium. Students were offered multiple channels of communication. They were also asked to contribute to the content material. Course data analysis demonstrated an unprecedented level of participation, exchange and student satisfaction as expressed in the surveys that followed the course’s completion.

KEYWORDS
architectural design studio, blended courses, connectivist theory, online learning tools, student interaction

FULL ARTICLE
https://www.iu-cg.org/paper/2015/IU_CG_03-2015_ioannou.pdf (0.98 MB)

CITATION

Copy citation to clipboard (APA style)

LITERATURE AND SOURCES:
Barber, M., Donnely, K., Rizvi, S., (2013). An avalanche is coming, Institute for Public Policy Research, London UK.
Bender, D., (2005). Developing a Collaborative Multidisciplinary Online Design Course, The Journal of Educators Online, Volume 2, Number 2, July 2005.
Comier, D., Siemens, G., (2010). Through the Open Door: Open Courses as Research, Learning, and Engagement, Educause Review, vol. 45, no. 4 (July/August), http://er.educause.edu/articles/2010/8/through-the-open-door-open-courses-as-research-learning-and-engagement, Accessed 02 October, 2015.
Daniel, J., (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility, Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 3, http://doi.org/10.5334/2012-18, Accessed 29 September, 2015.
Davidson, C., (2013). How a Class Becomes a Community: Theory, Method, Examples for Your Hacking Pleasure, http://www.hastac.org/blogs/cathy-davidson/2013/03/18/how-class-becomes-community-theory-method-examples-your-hacking-plea Accessed 09 June, 2015.
DeBoer, J., Ho, A., Stump, G., & Breslow, L. (2014). Changing “course:” reconceptualizing educational variables for massive open online courses. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 74-84. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14523038 page 1.
Devetakovich, M., Arsic, P., Nikolic, I., Petrusevski, Lj., and Mitrovic, B., (2011). Integration of e-learning concepts in urban design studio: The case of virtual learning environment supporting a specific educational mode, in Proceedings of YU Info 2011 Conference (26-32). Kopaonik, Serbia: Information Society of Serbia.
Dede, C., (Ed.), (2013). Connecting the dots: new technology-based models for postsecondary learning. EDUCAUSE Review, September/October 2013. http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/connecting-dots-new-technology-based-models-postsecondary-learning. Accessed 15 June 2015.
Downes, St., (2012). Connectivism and Connected Knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks, National Research Council Canada, Version 1.0 – May 19, 2012, ISBN: 978-1-105-77846-9, page 11.
Fletcher, M., Bjerkass, A., (2012). Structured Design Approach for Converting Classroom Courses for Online Delivery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA, Journal of Online Engineering Education, Vol. 4, No 1, http://www.onlineengineeringeducation.com/joee_v4n1a1.pdf Accessed 12 June, 2015.
Griffiths, R.J., (2013). MOOCs in the classroom?, http://www.sr.ithaka.org/publications/moocs-in-the-classroom, Accessed 29 September, 2015.
Guo, Ph., (2014). How MOOC Video Production Affects Student Engagement, https://www.edx.org/blog/how-mooc-video-production-affects#.VMK9LSyxspM Accessed 3 June, 2015.
Hanna, D., (2012). Converting your course to a blended format: Instructor Guide, Learning and Teaching, Ryerson University, page 6-7, http://www.ryerson.ca/content/dam/lt/instructional/instructor_guide_hybrid.pdf, Accessed 12 June, 2015.
Hollands, F., Tirthali, D., (2014). MOOCS: Expectations and Reality, Full Report, Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education Teachers College, Columbia University, page 30.
Kolb, D.A, (1981). Learning Styles and disciplinary differences. In A. Chickering. (Ed.), The modern American College (pp232-255). San Fransisco: Jossey Bass.
Kop, R., (2011). The Challenges to Connectivist Learning on Open Online Networks: Learning Experiences during a Massive Open Online Course, in International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol. 12.3, March 2011, http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/882/1823, Accessed 02 October, 2015.
Kreber, C., (2009). Supporting Student Learning in the Context of Diversity, Complexity and Uncertainty. In C. Kreber, (Ed.) The University and its Disciplines: Teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries, New York: Routledge, pages 6, 7. Norton, A., Sonnemann, J., McGannon, C. (2013). The online evolution: when technology meets tradition in higher education, Grattan Institute, p.20-30.
Salama, A. M., (2015). Spatial Design Education: New Directions for Pedagogy in Architecture and Beyond. Surrey; Burlington: Ashgate.
Siemens, G., (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the Digital Age, elearnspace, http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm, Accessed 12 June, 201, p. 85.
Siemens, G., (2012). Designing and Running a MOOC (in 9 easy steps), slides 27-37, http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/09/04/designing-and-running-a-mooc-in-9-easy-steps, Accessed 09 June, 2015.
Swope, J., (2014). Building Your Own Online Class? – How to Choose the MOOC Platform, http://moocnewsandreviews.com/building-your-own-online-class-how-to-choose-the-mooc-platform.
Yee, S., (2001). Building Communities for Design Education: Using Telecommunication Technology for Remote Collaborative Learning, PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Architecture.