CREATIVITY GAME

Tomaž Berčič:

The Gradual Process of Change: Integrating Shape Grammars in Parametric Tools

DOI 10.15292/IU-CG.2024.12.046-054 | UDK 72:004.925.8:37.091.3 | SUBMITTED: 10/2024 | REVISED: 11/2024 | PUBLISHED: 12/2024
Author's affiliation: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Architecture, Slovenia

PDF

ABSTRACT
The shape grammar methodology presents a compelling tool for students and professionals in design disciplines. This article illustrates the integration of shape grammar with contemporary parametric tools, explicitly avoiding the reliance on specialised custom software to facilitate its application in routine practices. The study’s primary objective is to broaden the discourse on the practical benefits of shape grammar in both educational and professional settings while exploring methods of implementation that enhance user interaction and integration. Current shape grammar tools often fall short in usability due to insufficient integration within commonly used software platforms. This research demonstrates how shape grammar can be implemented within established parametric software, such as Rhinoceros 3D, using Grasshopper. This approach does not claim to be simpler than dedicated interpreters but demonstrates its feasibility within a familiar parametric design environment. The study provides six examples showcasing the application of shape grammar within Rhinoceros 3D, utilising the Grasshopper parametric extension. The findings reveal that the shape grammar methodology can be seamlessly adapted to align with standard tools, facilitating further modifications, re-creation, and evaluation of design data. The adaptability of the shape grammar system underscores its potential applicability across diverse design fields. Using a Visual Programming Language (VPL) embedded directly in the software environment enhances functionality, thereby addressing a significant limitation of shape grammar theory by enabling the evaluation of generated design alternatives.

KEYWORDS
shape grammar, parametric design, Grasshopper, parametric tools, architecture, education

FULL ARTICLE
https://iu-cg.org/paper/2024/IU-CG.2024.12.046-054.pdf (0.8 MB)

CITATION

Copy citation to clipboard (APA style)

LITERATURE AND SOURCES:
Ažman Momirski, L. (2018). Negotiating dynamic variables in urban regeneration process: A case study of the degraded Kranj railway station area. Prostor, 26(1 (55)), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.31522/p.26.1(55).12
Beirão, J., & Duarte, J. P. (2018). Generic grammars for design domains. AI EDAM, 32(2), 225–239.
Bercic, T., Bohanec, M., & Ažman Momirski, L. (2018). Role of decision models in the evaluation of spatial design solutions. Annales: Anali za istrske in mediteranske študije – Series Historia et Sociologia, 28(3), 621–636.
Berčič, T. (2021). Vrednotenje prostorskih rešitev z večparametrskimi modeli = Evaluation of spatial solutions through multiparametric models [[T. Berčič]]. https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=137203
Berčič, T., Bohanec, M., & Ažman Momirski, L. (2024). Integrating multi-criteria decision models in smart urban planning: A case study of architectural and urban design competitions. Smart Cities, 7(2), 786–805. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7020033
Cuff, D. (2001). Digital pedagogy: An essay. Architectural Record, (9), 200–204.
Čok, G. (2014). Residential buildings and sustainable development in Slovenia = Stambene zgrade i održivi razvoj u Sloveniji. Prostor – znanstveni časopis za arhitekturu i urbanizam, 1(47), 134–147.
Duarte, J. P. (2001). Customising mass housing: A discursive grammar for Siza's Malagueira houses [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology].
Duarte, J. P. (2005). A discursive grammar for customising mass housing: The case of Siza's houses at Malagueira. Automation in Construction, 14(2), 265–275.
Duarte, J. P., & Beirão, J. (2011). Towards a methodology for flexible urban design: designing with urban patterns and shape grammars. Environment and Planning B: planning and design, 38(5), 879-902.
Fleisher, A. (1992). Grammatical architecture? Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 19, 221–226.
Food4Rhino1. (2019). RUPA (Shape Grammar Design Assistant). [Online]. Available at: https://www.food4rhino.com/app/rupa-shape-grammar-design-assistant [Accessed 16 Oct. 2019].
Food4Rhino2. (2019). SortalGI Shape Grammar Interpreter. [Online]. Available at: https://www.food4rhino.com/app/sortalgi-shape-grammar-interpreter [Accessed 16 Oct. 2019].
Food4Rhino3. (2019). Anemone. [Online]. Available at: https://www.food4rhino.com/app/anemone [Accessed 16 Oct. 2019].
Food4Rhino4. (2019). Hoopsnake. [Online]. Available at: https://www.food4rhino.com/app/hoopsnake [Accessed 16 Oct. 2019].
Garcia, S. (2016). Classifications of shape grammars. In Proceedings of the Design Computing and Cognition conference, DCC 2016 (pp. 259–278). Chicago, United States.
Garcia, S., & Menezes Leitão, A. (2018). Shape grammars as design tools: An implementation of a multipurpose chair grammar. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 32(2), 240–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0890060417000610
Goh, E., Gallo, R., Hom, J., Strong, E., Weng, Y., Kerman, H., Cool, J. A., Kanjee, Z., Parsons, A. S., Ahuja, N., Horvitz, E., Yang, D., Milstein, A., Olson, A. P. J., Rodman, A., & Chen, J. H. (2024). Large language model influence on diagnostic reasoning: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open, 7(10), e2440969.
Grasl, T., & Economou, A. (2018). From shapes to topologies and back: An introduction to a general parametric shape grammar interpreter. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 32(2), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0890060417000506
Hong, T. C. K., & Economou, A. (2023). Implementation of shape embedding in 2D CAD systems. Automation in Construction, 146, 104640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104640
Hudson, R. (2010). Strategies for parametric design in architecture: An application of practice-led research [Doctoral dissertation, University of Bath].
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Knight, T. (2000). Shape grammars in education and practice: History and prospects. International Journal of Design Computing, 2(67).
Knight, T., & Stiny, G. (2001). Classical and non-classical computation. Arq: Architectural Research Quarterly, 5(4), 355–372.
Koning, H., & Eisenberg, J. (1981). The language of the prairie: Frank Lloyd Wright's prairie houses. Environment and Planning B, 8, 295–323.
Lauzzana, R. G., & Pocock-Williams, L. (1988). A rule system for analysis in the visual arts. Leonardo, 21(4), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.2307/1578709
Leitão, A., Santos, L., & Lopes, J. (2012). Programming languages for generative design: A comparative study. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 10(1), 139–162.
McKay, A., Chase, S., Shea, K., & Chau, H. H. (2012). Spatial grammar implementation: From theory to usable software. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 26, 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060412000042
Oxman, R. (2004). Think-Maps: Teaching design thinking in design education. Design Studies, 25(1), 63–91.
Oxman, R. (Ed.). (2006). Digital design [Special issue]. Design Studies, 27(3).
Stiny, G. (1980a). Introduction to shape and shape grammars. Environment and Planning B, 7, 343–351.
Stiny, G. (1980b). Kindergarten grammars: Designing with Froebel's building gifts. Environment and Planning a 125–135.
Stiny, G. (2006). Shape: Talking about seeing and doing. MIT Press.
Stiny, G., & Gips, J. (1972). Shape grammar and the generative specification of painting and sculpture. In C. V. Freiman (Ed.), Information Processing 71 (pp. 1460–1465). North-Holland.
Mitchell, W., & Stiny, G. (1978). The palladian grammar. Environment and Planning B, 5, 5-18.
Stiny, G., & Mitchell, W. J. (1980). The grammar of paradise: On the generation of Mughul gardens. Environment and Planning B, 7, 209–226.
Tapia, M. (1999). A visual implementation of a shape grammar system. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(1), 59–73.
Verovsek, S., Juvancic, M., & Zupancic, T. (2013). Understanding and interpreting urban space (in)formation. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 11(2), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1260/1478-0771.11.2.135