CREATIVITY GAME


Theory and Practice of Spatial Planning | Number 12 | Year 2024 | ISSN 2350-3637

Vojko Kilar1, Martina Zbašnik-Senegačnik1, Mitja Zorc1:

Assessment of Earthquake Risk of Primary Schools in Slovenia

Creative Commons License DOI 10.15292/IU-CG.2024.12.026-034 | UDK 699.8:727:373(497.4) | SUBMITTED: 11/2024 | REVISED: 12/2024 | PUBLISHED: 12/2024
Author's affiliation: 1 University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Architecture, Slovenia



ABSTRACT
Slovenia is one of the most earthquake-prone countries in Europe. Estimates show that between 6% and 14% of the Slovenian building stock is at ​​high seismic risk, especially buildings that were built in periods when there were no regulations for seismic-resistant construction or the requirements were significantly lower than today. Elementary school buildings discussed in the article are no exception. Due to their significant role for the society, the requirement for their seismic resistance is of utmost importance. Based on the analysis of basic data from the fund of 766 elementary school buildings in Slovenia, the article determines the number of buildings that were built during the period of particular regulations for seismic-resistant construction, the number of floors and the material for the supporting structure. Based on these data it is possible to draw conclusions about seismic resistance of buildings. For buildings that were built after 1999 and according to Eurocode 8, and most of the buildings that were built after 1981, we can conclude that they are earthquake resistant. A large part of the buildings that are still in use today were built in past historical periods and corresponded to the building regulations in force at that time. We can conclude that from the point of view of today’s requirements, these buildings are probably less seismically resistant or even dangerous and would in the coming years need seismic rehabilitation, as is planned by the Resolution on strengthening seismic resistance until 2050. However, for an accurate assessment of seismic resistance, it is necessary to examine each building individually due to its specific spatial or structural design.

KEYWORDS
school buildings, earthquake resilience, assessment of earthquake risk, seismic rehabilitation of school buildings

FULL ARTICLE
https://iu-cg.org/paper/2024/IU-CG.2024.12.026-034.pdf (0.38 MB)

CITATION
Kilar, V., Zbašnik-Senegačnik, M., Zorc, M. (2024). Assessment of Earthquake Risk of Primary Schools in Slovenia. Igra ustvarjalnosti - Creativity Game, (12), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.15292/IU-CG.2024.12.026-034

Copy citation to clipboard (APA style)

LITERATURE AND SOURCES:
Blenkuš, M. in Zorc, M. (2017). Izsledki kvantitativne analize stavbnega fonda osnovnih šol v Sloveniji = The results of a quantitative analysis of the building fund for elementary schools in Slovenia. AR: arhitektura, raziskave = architecture, research, 2, 48–59.
Bosiljkov, V., Page, A. W., Bokan-Bosiljkov, V. in Žarnić, R. (2008). Evaluation of the seismic performance of brick masonry walls. Structural control and health monitoring, 17(1), 239–249.
Bubnov, S. (1983). Potresna varnost starejših zgradb. Univerzum.
Bubnov, S., Fajfar, P., Fischinger, M., Ribarič, V., Tomaževič, M., Aničić, D., Poceski, A., Rosman, R. in Steinman, V. (1982). Izgradnja objekata visokogradnje u seizmičkim područjima: ocena pravilnika. Publikacija IKPIR 25. Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za arhitekturo, gradbeništvo in geodezijo, Inštitut za konstrukcije, potresno inženirstvo in računalništvo: Zavod za raziskavo materiala in konstrukcij: Seizmološki zavod SRS.
CEN – European Committee for Standardisation (2004). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. https://www.phd.eng.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/en.1998.1.2004.pdf
CNR (2018). Advisory Committee on Technical Recommendations for Construction: Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded Fibre Reinforced Inorganic Matrix Systems for Strengthening Existing Structures.
Dolšek, M., Babič, A. in Žižmond, J. (2021). Ali je treba v Republiki Sloveniji krepiti potresno odpornost skupnosti? : usposabljanje predstavnikov lokalnih skupnosti in širše strokovne javnosti o širši, energetski in potresni prenovi stavb (U6-2). Life projekt CARE4CLIMATE, Ministrstvo za okolje in prostor Republike Slovenije.
Dujič, B. in Žarnić, R. (2008). Vrednotenje potresne odpornosti lesene gradnje. V: Kitek Kuzman, M. (ur.), Gradnja z lesom – izziv in priložnost za Slovenijo (str. 176–181). Univerza v Ljubljani, Biotehniška fakulteta, Oddelek za lesarstvo.
Fajfar, P. (2017). Razvoj predpisov za potresno odporno gradnjo v Sloveniji. Gradbeni vestnik, 66, 82–96.
Fajfar, P., Fischinger M. in Isaković T. (2000). Metoda procjene seizmičkog ponašanja zgrada i mostova. Građevinar, 52(3), 663–671.
Gradbeni zakon. 1931. Tiskovna zadruga.
ICOMOS, 2017. Pristopi k ohranjanju kulturne dediščine 20. stoletja: Madridsko-newdelhijski dokument 2017. https://icomos.splet.arnes.si/files/2021/02/Icomos_brosura_Web.pdf
Ivanšek, F. (ur.) (1954). Od stare k novi šoli. Referati in material s posvetovanja o gradnji sodobne šole. Arhitekt, 12/13.
Kilar, V. in Kušar, D. (2009). Assessment of the earthquake vulnerability of multi-residential buildings in Slovenia. Acta geographica Slovenica, 49(1), 89–118.
Lazar Sinković, N., Dolšek, M. in Babič, A. (2021). Modeli komunikacije potresnega tveganja. Ujma: revija za vprašanja varstva pred naravnimi in drugimi nesrečami, 34/35, 409–416.
Lutman, M., Capuder, F., Drobnič, D., Gams, M., Klemenc, I., Kramar, M., Pazlar, T., Weiss, P. (2017). Posegi v nosilno konstrukcijo stavb. Ministrstvo za okolje in prostor RS, Direktorat za prostor, graditev in stanovanja.
Mapei (2020). Protipotresna sanacija vrtcev in šol v Ljubljani. https://www.mapei.com/si/sl/novice-in-dogodki/podrobnosti-dogodka/2020/04/17/protipotresna-sanacija
MNVP – Ministrstvo za naravne vire in prostor RS (2023). Ocena zmožnosti obvladovanja tveganja za potres. https://www.gov.si/assets/ministrstva/MNVP/Dokumenti/Graditev/ocena_zmoznosti_obvladovanja_tveganja_za_potres.docx
MO – Ministrstvo za obrambo RS (2018). Ocena ogroženosti Republike Slovenije zaradi potresov. https://www.gov.si/assets/organi-v-sestavi/URSZR/Datoteke/Ocene-ogrozenosti/ocena_ogrozenosti_potres.pdf
Navinšek, E. (1978). S prostorno znanostjo in analizo do brezkoridorne arhitekture. http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-2HLCTA35
Orožen Adamič, M. (1995). Earthquake threat in Ljubljana. Geografski zbornik, 35, 145–151.
Orožen Adamič, M. in Hrvatin, M. (2001). Geografske značilnosti potresov v Posočju. Geografski zbornik, 41, 45–90.
Orožen Adamič, M. in Perko D. (1996). Potresna ogroženost občin in naselij v Sloveniji. Geografski zbornik, 36, 7–45.
Ostanek, F. (ur.) (1973). Razstava 5 let – 100 šol (katalog ob razstavi). Slovenski šolski muzej, Izobraževalna skupnost Slovenije.
Petrovčič, S. in Kilar, V. (2018). Arhitekturno-tehnični vidik varovanja arhitekturne dediščine na potresno ogroženih območjih. Annales : anali za istrske in mediteranske študije. Series historia et sociologia, 28(3), 589– 610.
Petrovčič, S. in Kilar, V. (2022). Design considerations for retrofitting of historic masonry structures with externally bonded FRP systems. International journal of architectural heritage : conservation, analysis and restoration, 16(7), 957–976.
POTROG, 2019. Raziskovalni projekt Potresna ogroženost v Sloveniji za potrebe Civilne zaščite. https://potrog2.vokas.si/
PTP – Privremeni tehnički propisi. 1948. Beograd.
Resolucija o krepitvi potresne varnosti do leta 2050 »PREHITIMO POTRES« (ReKPV50). (2023). Uradni list RS, št. 122/2023. https://pisrs.si/pregledPredpisa?id=RESO150
Roške in Streliške stolpnice (2023). Protipotresna utrditev Roških in Streliških stolpnic. https://roskeinstreliskestolpnice.si/
RTV SLO (2023). Kakšne bi bile pri nas posledice rušilnega potresa? https://val202.rtvslo.si/podkast/frekvenca-x/31057643/174938037
Slak, T. in Kilar, V. (2005). Potresno odporna gradnja in zasnova konstrukcij v arhitekturi. Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za arhitekturo.
Stavbinski red za mesto Ljubljana, 1896. http://www.dlib.si/?URN=URN:NBN:SI:DOC-SWFPDKPP
Tomaževič, M. (1998). Ocenjevanje uporabnosti po potresu poškodovanih objektov. Ministrstvo za obrambo, Uprava RS za zaščito in reševanje.
Tomaževič, M. (2009). Potresno odporne zidane stavbe. Tehnis.
Zbašnik-Senegačnik, M., Blenkuš, M., Gregorski, M., Nardoni Kovač, Š., Zaviršek Hudnik, D., Zorc, M., Cencič, M. in Štemberger, T. (2019). Analiza stanja na področju arhitekture javnih vrtcev in šol v Sloveniji –  evidentiranje, vrednotenje in varovanje primerov kakovostne (trajnostne) arhitekturne prakse : raziskovalni projekt Ciljnega raziskovalnega programa "CRP 2016". Zaključno poročilo 2019. Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za arhitekturo.
Zorc, M. (2016). En sam, velik, svetel, uporaben prostor, 14 šol Emila Navinška v Ljubljani. Galerija DESSA 7. 12.–21. 1. 2016, Razstava študentov Fakultete za arhitekturo Univerze v Ljubljani.
Zorc, M. (2024). Učilnice na kupu še ne naredijo skupka učnih prostorov. V Zbašnik-Senegačnik, M., Gregorski, M. in Zorc, M. (ur.), Na poti k sodobni šolski arhitekturi (str. 93–132). Zavod Republike Slovenije za šolstvo.
Žarnić, R. (2005). Lastnosti gradiv. Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za gradbeništvo in geodezijo.
24ur (2021). Bo Sloveniji, kjer je zelo nizka potresna odpornost, uspelo prehiteti potres? https://www.24ur.com/novice/slovenija/bo-sloveniji-uspelo-prehiteti-potres.html