CREATIVITY GAME


Theory and Practice of Spatial Planning | Number 11 | Year 2023 | ISSN 2350-3637

Manca Gjura Godec1, Matej Nikšič2:

Empowering Public Engagement in Spatial Planning: A Collaborative Mapping Approach

Creative Commons License DOI 10.15292/IU-CG.2023.11.066-071 | UDK 711:631.47:005.56 | SUBMITTED: 10/2023 | REVISED: 11/2023 | PUBLISHED: 12/2023
Author's affiliation: 1 University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Architecture, Slovenia, 2 Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia



ABSTRACT
This paper explores collaborative mapping as an approach to enhance public engagement in spatial planning. It provides insights into the current state of the art in collaborative mapping for practitioners and policymakers aiming to utilize its potential for better spatial planning. Through a systematic analysis of relevant literature, it investigates the evolution, application, and challenges of collaborative mapping. A comprehensive search of relevant sources on Google Scholar reveals the growing interest in collaborative mapping, particularly since 2018, with a focus on topics like land use and accessibility. The review underscores the importance of democratizing spatial data collection and highlights the role of user-generated content in participatory approaches. Public participation in collaborative mapping is examined, emphasizing the inclusion of diverse stakeholders and the need for tailored approaches to accommodate varied motivations for engagement. Advantages such as cost reduction and data provision are balanced against challenges like data quality, semantic issues and accessibility barriers. Key dimensions of collaborative mapping, including cost reduction, data accuracy, semantic issues and stakeholder importance, are addressed in more detail.

KEYWORDS
collaborative mapping, public engagement, spatial planning, participatory GIS, crowdsourcing

FULL ARTICLE
https://iu-cg.org/paper/2023/IU-CG.2023.11.066-071.pdf (0.14 MB)

CITATION
Gjura Godec, M., Nikšič, M. (2023). Empowering Public Engagement in Spatial Planning: A Collaborative Mapping Approach. Igra ustvarjalnosti - Creativity Game, (11), 66-71. https://doi.org/10.15292/IU-CG.2023.11.066-071

Copy citation to clipboard (APA style)

LITERATURE AND SOURCES:
Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209104824
Brabham, D. C. (2012). Motivations for Participation in a Crowdsourcing Application to Improve Public Engagement in Transit Planning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40(3), 307–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2012.693940
DePaula, R. (2004). Lost in translation: A critical analysis of actors, artifacts, agendas, and arenas in participatory design. Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Participatory Design Artful Integration: Interweaving Media, Materials and Practices - PDC 04, 1, 162. https://doi.org/10.1145/1011870.1011890
García-Nieto, A. P., Quintas-Soriano, C., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Montes, C., & Martín-López, B. (2015). Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: The role of stakeholders׳ profiles. Ecosystem Services, 13, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.006
Jokar Arsanjani, J., & Vaz, E. (2015). An assessment of a collaborative mapping approach for exploring land use patterns for several European metropolises. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 35, 329–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2014.09.009
Panek, J., & Netek, R. (2019). Collaborative Mapping and Digital Participation: A Tool for Local Empowerment in Developing Countries. Information, 10(8), 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10080255
Rouse, L. J., Bergeron, S. J., & Harris, T. M. (2007). Participating in the Geospatial Web: Collaborative Mapping, Social Networks and Participatory GIS. In A. Scharl & K. Tochtermann (Eds.), The Geospatial Web (pp. 153–158). Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-827-2_14
Srinivas Sajja, P., & Akerkar, R. (2016). Intelligent Technologies for Web Applications (0 ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/b12118
Van Herzele, A. (2004). Local Knowledge in Action: Valuing Nonprofessional Reasoning in the Planning Process. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X04267723
Voigt, C., Dobner, S., & Schmidt, M. (2016). Collaborative Mapping and the Reliability of Volunteered Data.